A problem worth solving
A persistent challenge connected to how people live, participate, adapt, or flourish.

For founders, innovators, and people with ideas
World Seed Fund begins with the person—not the pedigree, geography, title, or proximity to established institutions. There is no deadline, no required format, and no entity required to introduce an idea.
What we look for
Ideas may begin with an individual, team, enterprise, cooperative, laboratory, classroom, community, or long-held system of knowledge.
A persistent challenge connected to how people live, participate, adapt, or flourish.
An idea grounded in imagination, scientific knowledge, local experience, cultural knowledge, or lived understanding.
A clear way to explore, test, strengthen, or implement the idea in context.
A meaningful contribution to the community or system the idea is designed to serve.
Eligibility
If you can describe a real problem, your insight into it, and a next step, you are eligible. Everything below exists to make that concrete.
There is no institutional gate. We read introductions from people, not from letterheads.
Anywhere. Distance from capital, institutions, or investors is the problem we exist to close, not a reason to decline.
Three things only. Everything else is negotiable.
The usual signals of readiness are not entry conditions here.
Stages supported
Support is available at any of five stages. An untested observation belongs at Discover; a piloted product belongs at Prove or Connect. Support is matched to the stage — funding, research capacity, testing, equipment, introductions, or policy guidance.
An idea, an observation, or a question that has not been tested yet. Support goes to understanding the problem properly — field study, listening, measurement, prior art.
A defined idea that needs its first working conditions: a small budget, a partner, materials, permissions, or the right expert in the room.
A first version exists. Support goes to a real pilot with real users, honest measurement, and a written account of what failed.
Evidence exists and the idea needs the institutions that carry it — operators, clinics, ministries, schools, utilities, cooperatives, researchers.
Local success is confirmed. Support goes to responsible adoption elsewhere, only where evidence and context hold.
What to include
The strongest introduction is not a polished pitch. Answer these six prompts in your own words — a page is plenty. Attachments are welcome but never required.
The problem in one paragraph: who lives with it, where, and what it costs them today. Name the place.
What you have imagined, discovered, built, or learned — described plainly enough for a non-specialist to picture it.
Anything you already know: a trial, a measurement, a season of use, a conversation with the people served. Small and honest beats large and projected.
One step you would take in the next few months, what it would cost roughly, and how you would know whether it worked.
The knowledge, capability, relationship, permission, or opportunity that would unlock the step.
Who you are, how you came to this problem, and who else is with you. A few sentences is enough.
Common questions
Answers to what founders ask most often about eligibility, stages, timing, and what support actually looks like.
Anyone with a specific idea and a genuine connection to the problem it addresses — individuals, informal teams, companies, cooperatives, laboratories, classrooms, and community groups. No legal entity, prior funding, or institutional affiliation is required to introduce an idea.
No. There is no window and no cycle. Introductions are read as they arrive, and you can introduce an idea at any time through the contact page.
Any of five: Discover, Mobilize, Prove, Connect, or Advance. An untested observation is welcome at Discover; a piloted product is welcome at Prove or Connect. What matters is that the next step is specific.
Ideas within nine focus areas grouped into four categories: natural resources and sustainability, health and human wellbeing, knowledge and culture, and infrastructure and mobility. Each area page lists its own qualifying criteria.
No. A clear written account of the problem, the idea, the evidence, and the next step is more useful to us than a deck. Answer the six prompts in the submission section in your own words.
No. Support is matched to what the idea actually needs — that may be funding, but it is often research capacity, testing, equipment, introductions to operators or institutions, policy guidance, or a route to responsible adoption.
Introducing an idea does not transfer any rights. Any arrangement is discussed openly with you, in writing, before it is made, and is shaped around the idea's context rather than a standard template.
Every introduction is read by a person. If it fits, we come back with questions rather than a verdict, then work with you to define the first step and the people or institutions who should be involved.
Ideas with no identifiable people behind the problem, requests for general operating support unconnected to a specific step, purely speculative financial products, and proposals we cannot judge because they describe an outcome without describing a method.
Human potential is everywhere. Opportunity should be too.